Top IT Companies for Aerospace

Browse 14 IT service providers with proven Aerospace industry experience. From managed IT to cybersecurity and software development — find the right partner who understands your sector.

14 companies4.3 avg rating

14 companies found

#1Tricension

Tricension

5.0(0)US

Eliminating Technical Obstacles, Realizing Business Opportunities

Software DevelopmentApplication ManagementMobile App Development·<$25 · 1-9 emp. · From <$1000
#2Bloo Solutions

Bloo Solutions

5.0(0)US

Let us give you the peace of mind you deserve.

IT ConsultingCybersecurityManaged IT Services·<$25 · 1-9 emp. · From <$1000
#3IMP Solutions

IMP Solutions

4.0(0)CA
IT ConsultingCybersecurityManaged IT Services·<$25 · 1-9 emp. · From <$1000 · Est. 1987
#4Bulletproof

Bulletproof

4.0(0)US
IT ConsultingCybersecurityManaged IT Services·<$25 · 1-9 emp. · From <$1000 · Est. 2000
#5Ainsworth Inc.

Ainsworth Inc.

4.0(0)CA
IT ConsultingManaged IT ServicesNetwork Management·<$25 · 1-9 emp. · From <$1000 · Est. 1946
#6Buchanan Technologies

Buchanan Technologies

4.0(0)US

An IT Partner Where Every Interaction Matters

IT ConsultingCybersecurityManaged IT Services·<$25 · 1-9 emp. · From <$1000 · Est. 1988
#7CGI

CGI

4.0(0)US
IT ConsultingCybersecurityManaged IT Services·<$25 · 1-9 emp. · From <$1000 · Est. 1976
#8NOVO

NOVO

No reviewsUS

Technology support, Cyber Security, Compliance

IT ConsultingCybersecurityTechnology Advisory·<$25 · 1-9 emp. · From <$1000 · Est. 2018
#9Netirio

Netirio

No reviewsUS

Technology. People. Process

CybersecurityManaged IT ServicesManaged Cloud Services·1-9 emp. · From <$1000 · Est. 2019
#10SemiDot Infotech

SemiDot Infotech

No reviewsUS

Right Technology Partner for Next Generation IT Solutions

IT ConsultingCybersecurityManaged IT Services·<$25 · 1-9 emp. · From <$1000 · Est. 2011
#11smartShift Technologies

smartShift Technologies

No reviewsUS

A Better Way to Handle SAP Custom Code

Software Development·1-9 emp. · From <$1000 · Est. 2002
#12PivIT Strategy

PivIT Strategy

No reviewsUS

Adapt to beat your competition Level up in a digital world

IT ConsultingCybersecurityManaged IT Services·<$25 · 1-9 emp. · From <$1000 · Est. 2021
#13BroadMAX Networks

BroadMAX Networks

No reviewsUS

Managed Service Provider in Miami Doral

IT ConsultingCybersecurityManaged IT Services·<$25 · 1-9 emp. · From <$1000 · Est. 2007
#14Blockchain Studioz

Blockchain Studioz

No reviewsUS

Blockchain Development Company

Blockchain Development·<$25 · 1-9 emp. · From <$1000 · Est. 2015

Aerospace IT companies deliver specialized technology solutions to defense contractors, commercial aviation firms, satellite manufacturers, and MRO (maintenance, repair, and overhaul) providers. They bridge the gap between stringent regulatory frameworks - ITAR, EAR, DoD CMMC 2.0, FAA Part 21, and AS9100D - and the modern digital infrastructure that aerospace organizations need to remain competitive and compliant.

Without purpose-built IT support, aerospace firms face crippling compliance gaps: a single ITAR violation carries civil penalties up to $1.3 million per violation, CMMC 2.0 non-compliance disqualifies companies from DoD contracts, and unmanaged PLM environments lead to costly engineering change order (ECO) delays and configuration drift across Siemens Teamcenter or PTC Windchill instances.

Aerospace IT - By the Numbers

  • $965 billion - Global aerospace and defense market size in 2025, driving massive demand for compliant IT infrastructure and digital engineering tools.
  • 171,000+ - Number of active DoD supplier companies required to achieve CMMC 2.0 certification at Level 1, 2, or 3 by 2025-2026 contract cycles.
  • $1.3 million - Maximum civil penalty per ITAR violation, making compliance-focused IT support a financial necessity, not an option.
  • 40-60% - Reduction in engineering change order cycle time reported by aerospace firms after implementing properly configured PLM systems like Siemens Teamcenter 2024 or PTC Windchill 22.x.
  • AS9100D:2016 - The current quality management system standard for the aviation, space, and defense industry, requiring documented IT controls for configuration management and traceability.
  • 3-5x - Higher IT security spending per employee in aerospace versus general manufacturing, driven by CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information) protection requirements under NIST SP 800-171.

What Aerospace IT Companies Do

CMMC 2.0 and ITAR/EAR Compliance

Aerospace IT providers help defense contractors navigate the DoD Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC 2.0) framework, which became a formal contract requirement in late 2024. This includes gap assessments against NIST SP 800-171 rev2 controls, CUI data enclave design, System Security Plan (SSP) authoring, and preparation for third-party C3PAO assessments at CMMC Level 2. For ITAR and EAR, they implement access control systems, audit logging, and employee vetting workflows to ensure technical data never leaves authorized boundaries - including in cloud environments requiring GovCloud (AWS GovCloud, Azure Government) configurations.

PLM System Implementation and Integration

Product Lifecycle Management is the backbone of aerospace engineering. IT companies specialize in deploying, migrating, and customizing PLM platforms - primarily Siemens Teamcenter (2024.1 and later), PTC Windchill 22.x, and Dassault ENOVIA - to manage BOMs, CAD data (CATIA, NX, CREO), and engineering workflows. They also integrate PLM with ERP systems (SAP S/4HANA Aerospace and Defense, Oracle MFG), enabling seamless flow from engineering design to manufacturing execution without manual re-entry.

Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) for Aerospace

Aerospace MES deployments require traceability at the serial number level, first-article inspection (FAI) workflows per AS9102B, and non-conformance reporting (NCR) tied to quality records. IT firms configure platforms like Siemens Opcenter AX (formerly CAMSTAR), Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk, or Plex Manufacturing Cloud specifically for aerospace build-to-print and build-to-spec environments. These systems feed real-time production data to FAA-reportable quality systems and DAA (Designated Airworthiness Authority) documentation packages.

Secure Network and Cloud Infrastructure

Aerospace organizations handling CUI or export-controlled technical data cannot use standard commercial cloud tenants. IT providers architect CUI-compliant environments using Microsoft 365 GCC High, Azure Government, or AWS GovCloud with FedRAMP Moderate or High authorization. On-premises solutions use air-gapped network segments, hardware-based MFA (PIV/CAC card readers), and endpoint detection tools (CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Government) capable of meeting CMMC Level 2 incident response requirements.

FAA Regulatory Systems and Digital Documentation

For Part 21 and Part 145 certificate holders, IT companies build document management systems (DMS) that align with FAA Order 8110.4C and EASA Part 21 Subpart J requirements. This includes controlled document workflows, revision control integrated with PLM, and electronic logbook systems for aircraft maintenance records. Providers also support integration with the FAA's AMSYS, AFS-610 systems, and export of airworthiness data in standardized XML/S1000D formats for military programs.

Supply Chain Visibility and EDI

Tier 1 and Tier 2 aerospace suppliers must maintain precise visibility into subcomponent traceability and AS9100D supplier quality requirements. IT companies implement supply chain platforms (e.g., Exostar, Boeing PART, Airbus AirSupply portals) alongside EDI (X12 830, 856, 810 transactions) and API-based integrations with prime contractor systems. They also deploy counterfeit parts detection workflows per AS6081 and AS5553 standards, including material certification document management.

Aerospace IT Costs and Pricing

Aerospace IT engagements carry a significant premium over general IT services due to regulatory complexity, security requirements, and specialized domain expertise. Prices reflect 2025-2026 market rates for US-based aerospace IT firms.

  • CMMC 2.0 Readiness Assessment: $15,000 - $45,000 for a Level 2 gap assessment covering all 110 NIST SP 800-171 controls, SSP drafting, and remediation roadmap. Level 3 assessments targeting NIST SP 800-172 controls run $60,000 - $120,000+.
  • CUI Enclave Design and Implementation: $40,000 - $150,000+ for end-to-end CUI environment build-out on Microsoft 365 GCC High or AWS GovCloud, including identity federation, DLP policies, and SIEM integration.
  • PLM Implementation (Teamcenter or Windchill): $150,000 - $600,000+ for a mid-size aerospace OEM, covering licensing, configuration, data migration, ERP integration, and user training over a 6-18 month program.
  • MES Deployment (Opcenter, Plex): $80,000 - $400,000+ depending on plant size, number of work centers, and integration complexity. Annual SaaS/support fees add $30,000 - $120,000/year.
  • Managed ITAR-Compliant IT Services: $8,000 - $25,000/month for ongoing managed security, helpdesk, and infrastructure management within a CMMC-aligned environment for 50-200 users.
  • AS9100D IT Controls Audit Support: $5,000 - $20,000 per engagement to document IT processes, configure electronic records systems, and prepare for third-party registrar audits.

How to Choose an Aerospace IT Company

Selecting the wrong IT partner in aerospace can jeopardize your export license, DoD contract eligibility, or airworthiness certificate. Use these criteria to evaluate candidates:

  • Verify CMMC domain expertise: Ask for C3PAO relationships, Registered Practitioner Organization (RPO) status with the Cyber AB marketplace, and documented experience preparing clients for CMMC Level 2 third-party assessments - not just self-attestation.
  • Confirm ITAR/EAR personnel screening: All IT staff handling your technical data must be US persons (US citizens or lawful permanent residents). Ask for a written statement of policy and proof that foreign national subcontractors are excluded from your environment.
  • Evaluate PLM platform certifications: If you use Siemens Teamcenter or PTC Windchill, look for implementation partners with active partnership tiers (Siemens Solution Partner, PTC Partner Network Elite/Premier) and references from similarly sized aerospace programs.
  • Review incident response SLAs for CUI environments: CMMC requires a 72-hour incident reporting window to US-CERT/DIBNET. Your IT provider's incident response plan should explicitly cover this obligation and have a tested playbook.
  • Assess MRO or manufacturing domain knowledge: General-purpose MSPs often lack understanding of AS9100D quality records requirements, FAI (AS9102B) data flows, or serialized inventory traceability needs. Ask for aerospace-specific case studies.
  • Check for GovCloud or FedRAMP experience: Cloud migrations in ITAR-controlled environments are high-risk. Prioritize providers who have deployed Microsoft 365 GCC High or AWS GovCloud for aerospace clients and can share architecture diagrams and ATO documentation examples.

Aerospace IT - Frequently Asked Questions

What is CMMC 2.0 and when do aerospace companies need to comply?

CMMC 2.0 (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification) is a DoD framework that replaced the original CMMC 1.0 model in 2021 and became enforceable in DoD contracts starting in 2024-2025 through DFARS clause 252.204-7021. It has three levels: Level 1 (17 basic practices, annual self-attestation), Level 2 (110 practices aligned to NIST SP 800-171, requires third-party C3PAO assessment for most defense contractors), and Level 3 (134+ practices aligned to NIST SP 800-172, requires government-led assessment). Any aerospace company handling Federal Contract Information (FCI) or Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) on DoD programs must achieve the appropriate CMMC level to bid on or perform on new contracts.

Can aerospace companies use standard commercial cloud like Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace?

Standard commercial Microsoft 365 (E3/E5) and Google Workspace are not suitable for environments that store, process, or transmit ITAR-controlled technical data or DoD CUI. Microsoft 365 GCC High is the recommended minimum for CUI - it stores data in US-sovereign datacenters with US-citizen operator access only and meets DFARS 252.204-7012 cloud requirements. AWS GovCloud (US) and Azure Government are appropriate for infrastructure workloads. Google Workspace for Government can be used for FCI but not typically for ITAR/CUI without additional controls. Standard commercial tenants should be used only for non-export-controlled, non-CUI business functions.

What is the difference between Siemens Teamcenter and PTC Windchill for aerospace PLM?

Both are leading PLM platforms used extensively in aerospace. Siemens Teamcenter (current release: 2024.1) integrates natively with NX CAD and is widely used in defense programs and commercial aerospace (Airbus, Boeing suppliers). It offers strong MBSE (Model-Based Systems Engineering) capabilities via Teamcenter Requirements and the integration with Cameo/MagicDraw. PTC Windchill (current: 22.x with Windchill+ SaaS option) integrates natively with CREO and is common in MRO, aftermarket, and commercial aerospace supply chains. Windchill's Navigate module gives non-PLM users access to product data without full licenses. The choice often comes down to your CAD environment, existing Siemens or PTC licensing, and IT integration requirements with your ERP system.

How long does it take for an aerospace company to achieve CMMC Level 2 certification?

For a small-to-mid-size defense contractor (50-500 employees) starting from a typical commercial IT baseline, achieving CMMC Level 2 readiness typically takes 12-24 months. The timeline breaks into three phases: gap assessment and remediation planning (1-3 months), remediation implementation - including CUI enclave build-out, MFA deployment, SIEM configuration, vulnerability management, and policy documentation (6-18 months), and pre-assessment preparation and third-party C3PAO assessment scheduling (2-4 months, as C3PAO assessment slots have significant wait times in 2025-2026). Companies with existing strong IT infrastructure and documented security practices can compress this to 8-12 months. Budget $80,000 - $500,000+ for full Level 2 remediation depending on current posture.

What IT systems are required for AS9100D certification?

AS9100D (published 2016, the current revision) does not prescribe specific IT systems but requires documented processes that IT systems must support. These include: controlled document management with revision history and approval workflows (typically handled by a DMS, PLM, or SharePoint-based system); calibration record management for measurement equipment; nonconformance and corrective action (CAPA) tracking; supplier evaluation and qualification records; and traceability from customer requirements through design, manufacturing, and delivery. Common IT tools used to satisfy these requirements include Arena PLM, Greenlight Guru, Propel PLM, or custom SharePoint/Power Apps implementations. Your IT provider should map each AS9100D clause (Sections 4-10) to specific system capabilities and generate audit-ready evidence packages for your registrar (e.g., BSI, Bureau Veritas, TUV).